Green Leader Slams Labour: 'Using Jewish Pain' For Protest Ban
Green Party leader Zack Polanski accused Labour of exploiting Jewish suffering to justify an 'authoritarian' ban on pro-Palestinian marches, following an antisemitic attack in Golders Green. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood hinted at new powers to stop demonstrations, despite Polanski's warning against curtailing civil liberties.

Green Party leader Zack Polanski has publicly accused the Labour Party of cynically leveraging "Jewish pain" to advance an "authoritarian" agenda, specifically regarding a potential ban on pro-Palestinian marches. This accusation comes in the wake of an antisemitic attack in Golders Green, London, where two Jewish men were stabbed.
The context for this sharp exchange is the recent antisemitic terror attack in Golders Green, which left a 70-year-old and a 30-year-old Jewish man injured. Chief Rabbi Sir Ephraim Mirvis and others have called for tougher action against antisemitism. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood hinted at using new legislation to prevent marches, citing terror laws watchdog Jonathan Hall, who stated antisemitic language is "incubated" in such protests. Mahmood told BBC Radio 4's Today Programme that while protest is a fundamental British freedom, "far too many instances at protests where crimes are committed, where hate crime is committed." She added that the "scale of those protests, the intensity, the repeat nature of protests has placed particular pressures on the Jewish community."
Mr. Polanski, the only current Jewish leader of a major UK political party, condemned the suggestion. He told The Independent: "It is an outrage that this increasingly authoritarian government would now seek to use the pain of the Jewish community to seek further restrictions on the rights to peaceful protest." He further stated: "The Green Party will fight any restrictions on peaceful protest, whatever the cause, every step of the way." Polanski also highlighted his personal experience, saying: "I am the only Jewish leader of a major political party and I suffer antisemitic abuse every single day. For other politicians to use antisemitism as a political football, especially after these horrific attacks, is utterly appalling and should be beneath them."
For ordinary people, this debate means a direct challenge to the right to peaceful assembly. If the government proceeds with banning marches, it signals a significant curtailment of civil liberties, potentially affecting any group wishing to protest. It also raises questions about how the state balances public order and safety with fundamental freedoms, particularly in times of heightened tension and division.
This dispute underscores a growing political chasm between Labour and the Greens, particularly concerning the Gaza conflict. Labour's "balanced approach" and refusal to ban weapons sales to Israel have alienated some supporters, with polling expert Lord Robert Hayward predicting Labour could lose 1,850 council seats in the upcoming local elections, while the Greens are projected to gain 500. The Greens recently won the Gorton and Denton by-election, partly by targeting Muslim voters, and are expected to replace Labour in significant parts of London.
Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood stated plainly to BBC Breakfast: "I have already changed the law, and I won’t hesitate to do so again." This indicates a clear intention to use existing or new legislative powers to address the issue. The next steps will likely involve public debate and potential parliamentary action on new protest restrictions, should the government decide to pursue them, setting the stage for further confrontation with civil liberties advocates and opposition parties.
Original story
Zack Polanski accuses ‘authoritarian’ Labour of ‘using Jewish pain’ to consider ban on marches
The Independent Politics
More Elections Reports
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.


